The Zionist Conspiracy: Religious Heresy and Political Blackmail

The modern state of Israel was founded in 1948. The world was told this was a just cause due to the intense persecution they had endured by the Nazis during World War Two. However, if you dare to take a peek behind the curtain, it reveals a web of shadowy alliances, political subversion, and theological manipulation that brought the Zionist dream to life and by extension one of the most widespread deceptions of the modern age. Zionism, far from being a divine movement, is a carefully engineered maneuver backed by global elites who use their media puppets to silence and repress any views that speak to the contrary. Any who dare to question the legitimacy of the Israeli state or the morality of its political and military acts are quickly smeared as anti-Semitic, silencing truth of the matter in favor of keeping their propaganda machine alive. Thus, as we peal back the decades of lies that have built this facade, what unfolds is not a story of a prophecy fulfilled, but of an orchestrated deception — one that has reshaped both geopolitics and Christian belief itself.

Addressing Anti-Semitism

Before I delve into this topic fully, I must say that a lot of what I will be saying in this blog can be misconstrued as being anti-Semitic.

In today’s day and age, the terms “racist” and “anti-Semite” are thrown around in accusation when discussing the failures and crimes of the black and Jewish communities in particular. Even if when real evidence is brought forth to support these crimes, these terms are thrown around to distract from what the evidence says. This is a logical fallacy, and is often done to further political agendas.

I am not anti-Semitic, and I am not racist. I believe the Bible, and it says very clearly that we are all descendants of Adam. There is only ONE race: the human race. No “race” is superior because of lineage or skin color. Again, for clarity’s sake so that I am not misquoted, I AM NOT RACIST in any way. I am motivated only by seeking the truth, no matter which group is in the wrong.

I am, however, anti-Zionism. Zionism is not a race. It is a political ideology. Not all Zionists are Jews and not all Jews are Zionists.

A lot of times, when people are exposed to the fact that the Rothschilds claim to be Jews and they are the leading banking interest in the world, this mental program comes up that says something to the effect of “This information is against Jews and is therefore anti-Semite. Therefore it must be wrong, and I must never look into it ever again.”

This is intentional on the part of the elite, like the Rothschilds, in order for you to accept whatever they’re doing or else you will risk being called an “anti-Semite.” I have heard that to ask who you’re not allowed to question, and that is who controls you. I am not saying that “the Jews” are behind everything. As we will get into later, the mental block that people have to criticizing anything Jewish is something that must be broken. Many things need to be exposed, and the truth must be shared, no matter who is in the wrong.

I just wanted to state this out front so that it is kept in mind as we move along here.

What is Kabbalah?

I have been exposed to this aspect of the topic more recently than Zionism itself, so I am not as well-versed on this aspect as I am on others. For something more in-depth on this topic, I would suggest finding the “Exposing Kabbalah” series that Dan Duval has been released on YouTube, which you can find on my playlist “Exposing Zionism and Kabbalah” on my YouTube channel.

As I understand it, Kabbalah is Jewish mysticism. Many Christians are confused on this point. They think that the only thing the Jews believe differently than the Christians is that they do not accept the New Testament and Jesus Christ as the Messiah. They don’t understand why the Jews don’t accept Christ, since all of the prophecies of the Old Testament point to Him. This is only partially true, as the Jews do not believe the New Testament and that the Messiah has already come. However, this isn’t the only difference. Where they get a lot of their teaching is not just the Torah (the books of the Law), but also the Talmud, which is a collection of writings of Jewish Rabbis.

In the New Testament, Jesus warned against the traditions of the Pharisees. They put the rules that they set up as superior to the laws that God set up. This is what the Talmud is. This is what Christ was warning about.

I cannot tell you much more than this, because, again, I am not as familiar with this topic. For more on this, again, I strongly urge you to get the “Exposing Kabbalah” series mentioned above. In the series, Dan goes through how pervasive Kabbalah teaching is in the world today, such as in Freemasonry, the New Age Movement, and even modern Christianity.

What is Zionism?

As I mentioned at the beginning, Zionism basically teaches that Israel should have their own land to call their home to avoid persecution. The Israelites are God’s chosen people, and they must have their inheritance in the Promised Land, and anyone questioning this is questioning God’s plan for His people. No one is allowed to ask whether this is actually the case, as it is proven in the Bible.

To look at this from a big-picture point of view, is it okay to steal land from people and give it to another? No, it is not. The obvious question is, “Well, God promised the land to Abraham and his children and told Moses and Israel to take the Promised Land when they got there. They killed many people when they took it over. Why should they not be allowed to do that now?”

When the Israelites first came to the land of Canaan after they got out of Egypt, they sent their spies to check out the land. They came back and said that there were giants in the land. When before this were giants mentioned in the Bible? Before the flood. The Bible indicates, and this is supported by the extra-Biblical books of Jasher and First Enoch (not to be confused with Third Enoch, which is used in Kabbalah), that the giants before the Flood were fallen angels that intermingled with human females. Their offspring are commonly called the “Nephilim.” I, and many others, believe that this is the case when the Israelites took over Canaan. The giants in the land were starting to bring back some of the things from before the Flood. The reason that the Israelites were not allowed to intermingle with the surrounding nations and were even commanded to kill them, is because many of them practiced bestiality and transhumanism. This introduced diseases that would be considered incurable.

Compare that to today. Before there was a push for a modern state of Israel, were the Muslims practicing any of those things? Were they corrupting the human race, as the Nephalim were? No, they were not. Therefore it is neither Biblical nor moral for to take the land that was once belonging to the Palestinians and give it to those who call themselves Jews, yet are not. That may seem an inflammatory and completely unjustified statement, but let me explain myself.

Defining the Terms

Up until this point, I have been generalizing a bit when it comes to the term “the Jews,” so I would like to define who I am talking about when I say “the Jews.”

The following is a quote from Edna Ames from somewhere on the internet. Though I am not sure of the original source of the quote, the ideas presented are certainly correct. After this excerpt, I will go over some interesting points that are made in a little more detail.

First, we must start with the origins of both of the words Jew and Jewish. Both are recent modern words found nowhere in the New Testament or Old Testament Greek or Hebrew. Modern translations put both words there. The original words used are Yudaean, Yehudite, Yudaite. The letter J was never in the original Hebrew.

“The term “Jew” is an attempt to describe heritage.

“The term “Jewish” is an attempt to describe religious belief (Judaism).

“Mixing these terms up is done often and on purpose to bring confusion between heritage and religion. It’s why most people can’t explain the difference between the two terms.

“Literally anyone can become Jewish. Not everyone can be a Jew. Also, the vast majority of those that say they are Jews aren’t actually Jews but rather from the lineage of Esau. They are a mixed race.

“The term Jew isn’t derogatory whatsoever. It’s often the goal of those who convert to Judaism, but conversion doesn’t make you a Jew.

“To be considered a “Jew”, you’d have to either be from the tribe of Judah or have lived in Judea. It’s impossible to prove who are actually Jews today. After the destruction of the temple in 70 AD, records were destroyed.

“God’s people Israel, the people not the state (descendants of Jacob) had 12 tribes. Judah or the Jews were one of them. They were considered by Christ as stiffed necked and hard hearted. The Pharisees and Sadducees by example were real Jews. Born of a virgin, Christ came through the lineage of Judah, so that is why Jews think they are special and or chosen. It’s the cornerstone of the Jewish religion. Yet ironically they deny Christ.

“Over the centuries, the Synagogue of Satan and or the global cabal has figured this out. How to use this for their benefit. The goal was to hijack a heritage to use for political and financial gain. It’s become a gang moreover than a religion because of this. The perversion of the Torah via the Talmud has made this possible and is the blueprint for doing so dating back since Babylon. The Canaanites created Kabbalah, Jesuits, Illuminati, Templars, etc..

“Not all Jewish people are evil or bad. Many are ignorant to all of it. Nevertheless, they have gained from this ignorance. You rarely hear someone who is Jewish call out another Jewish person publicly. It is extremely rare. There are social and financial consequences for doing so.

“The people who are destroying the world identify as Jewish but are not actually even Jews. The all converted. Bill Gates, George Soros, Klaus Schwab, Rothchild family. Communism is Jewish, put forth by the Jewish Bolsheviks. The goal is total world domination and control. Up unto this point they have been extremely successful. Therefore, this topic is extremely important. Hiding behind terms like anti-Semitism is a cover to allow all of this to be unexamined and criticisms to be silenced.

“If you identify as a good Jewish person, the way you can help is simple. Lose the chosen mentality and help join the fight in exposing the hypocrisy and wickedness of the Talmud at all costs, as it’s destroying the world.”

The difference between Jew and Jewish may very well be a matter of semantics. However, I believe it is significant enough to warrant the distinction in this conversation today.

There is an important point made in the third-to-last paragraph, that being that not all Jews or Jewish people are evil. The Establishment – called by many names such as the Illuminati, the Great Conspiracy, the powers that shouldn’t be, etc. – does have some Jews at its helm, but not all are Jews, nor are all Jews a part of the “Great Conspiracy,” just as not every American is a part of the conspiracy. The vast majority are ignorant of the grand scheme that the high-ranking Satanists have.

For the sake of avoiding any confusion, I will be using the terms “Jew” and “Jewish” in the popular context that they are used today.

Who is Jewish?

This may seem like I am reiterating the point made above, but I am going to go a bit more in depth that what Edna Ames did above. This will define who I believe the true Jewish people are. You may rightfully say that this is the 12 tribes of Israel, but there are some very interesting nuances in the Bible and world history that may change your view on this.

When we consider the Israel as a nation in ancient times, she was birthed from Jacob, a.k.a. Israel, who was the grandson of Abraham. This is where the Israelites got their name as a nation. At this point they were not considered Jews, but Hebrews. They were not even called Jews after they got their first king, Saul.

After the reign of King Solomon, his son Rehoboam made unwise leadership choices which caused the nation to split in two. Up until this point, like I just said, these people were known only as “Hebrews” or “Israelites.” Once the kingdom split, the tribe of Benjamin and Judah became the southern kingdom, collectively called “Judah,” and the other tribes formed the northern kingdom, called “Israel.” It is at this point that the term “Jew” first becomes applicable, as it refers to someone from the southern kingdom. This is who the true Jews are by lineage. However, as stated above, it is impossible today to prove definitely who the true-born Jews are and who are not.

The book of Romans written by Apostle Paul further defines who is a Jew. Instead of redefining it, he expands it. Not only does the term Jew refer to someone who is a blood descendant of Judah or Benjamin, it applies to all born again Christians. Consider the last few verses of Romans 2: (note: I will use the King James Version, but I will paraphrase it just to make it a little more readable).

“Circumcision (or being a Jew by ancestry or conversion to Judaism) truly profits someone if you keep the law, but if you break the law, you circumcision is made as uncircumcision. Therefore if the uncircumcised keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

“If the uncircumcised fulfill the law, will they not judge you, who by the letter and circumcision transgress the law?

“He is not a Jew who is one outwardly. Neither are the circumcised, who are also outward in the flesh. But he is a Jew who is one inwardly and the circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter – whose praise is not towards men, but towards God.”

That last portion is the most important part. What this means is that the new definition of who is a Jew is one who is a child of God, even if he is a gentile, and not one who is of Jewish ancestry, yet still lives after the pleasures of the world. This definition forms a new Commonwealth of Israel. Thus, I, being of Dutch descent, am a gentile, yet because I am a child of God, I am one of His chosen people and a part of the Commonwealth of Israel.

Why is this important? Because there are those like what the Apostle John wrote in Revelation 3:9 – those that call themselves Jews, yet are not.

Who are the Modern Jews Descended From?

This is where the rubber meets the road as far as the confusion between Jew and Jewish.

I have not come across in my research that the majority of modern Jews are descendants of Esau (and as such not genuine Jews), but I have come across another interesting bit of data regarding their ancestry and where they came from.

For this we will go back to the Great Crusades of the Middle Ages. The two of the great powers, which were fighting over the region of Palestine that is commonly referred to as the “Holy Land,” were the Catholic Church of Europe and the Muslims of the Middle East. Both wanted the land for religious reasons.

To the north of the Middle East was a land known as the Khazar Empire, or Khazaria. This empire was situated just north of the Black and Caspian seas in what is now Russia, and was equal in power to both the Christians and the Muslims. Since they were just as powerful as either of the two, their ruler wanted to maintain their independence.

In order to remain neutral in the conflict between the Catholics and Muslims, in 740 AD the kagan, or ruler, of Khazaria converted the nation to Judaism. In his book The Thirteenth Tribe, Arthur Koestler, a Jewish Pulitzer Prize-winning author, showed that perhaps 90% of those who call themselves Jews today are descended from Khazaria, not ancient Israel.

What happened to Khazaria? Much like every other empire throughout history, this one crumbled over time due to invasions. These people, still calling themselves Jewish, settled in Eastern Europe particularly Poland.

In the outstanding documentary “Europa,”1 it is clearly shown that it is these Jewish people that instigated the Russian Revolution. As a matter of fact, nearly all of the leaders of the revolution in 1917 either were descendants of this Jewish race or had strong Jewish ties. I find it extraordinarily fascinating that it was this group of people that was targeted by Hitler and the Nazis. It is possible that most of the “Jews” that were killed in the Holocaust were descendants of the Khazar Empire, given that this is the area many of the Jews that were put in concentration camps came from. This is also probable given their involvement with the Communist takeover.

The Jews that came from Khazaria differed from those that came from the Middle East. To quote James Perloff’s book Truth is a Lonely Warrior, “They spoke Yiddish and became ethnically identified as Ashkenazi Jews. Light skinned, they contrast to Sephardic Jews, a minority of Jews today. Sephardim, whom many consider the Israelites’ real descendants, are darker skinned and more resemble Arabs, as one might expect, since true Jews and Arabs both have Abraham as their ancestor.”2

As I wrap this portion up, I am not trying to prove or disprove that any one person is or is not of Jewish descent. It would be difficult if not impossible to prove or disprove one’s ancestry back over 2000 years, especially since most of the records of Jewish lineages were destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD when they demolished Jerusalem. I am simply stating the facts of history. Whether you are of Jewish descent or not, Jesus Christ died for all, no matter the ancestry.

Cyrus I. Scofield, responsible for the writing of the Scofield Reference Bible, though many of the ideas written therein were not his own.

The Creation of the Scofield Reference Bible

Since we as children of God are the new Commonwealth of Israel, where did the idea come from that the Jews needed to have a homeland for themselves? The answer lies in perhaps in one of the greatest cons that the Christian church has ever swallowed – hook, line, and sinker – and was first introduced by a conman himself, Cyrus Scofield.

His infamous Scofield Reference Bible, which promoted ideas such as the Gap Theory and the pre-tribulation rapture, has adorned many a church pew across the western English-speaking world. However, his shady past is one that most people are unaware of.

He was born in Michigan, but raised in Tennessee. He served in the Confederate Army during the Civil War and claimed to have received the Confederate Cross of Honor for bravery at the battle of Antietam, though this claim is highly disputable. After the war, he lived with his sister in St. Louis, and married a few years later.

In 1869, he was sent to Atchison, Kansas, by his wife’s family to look after some business interests there. In 1873, he was appointed as U.S. Attorney for the district of Kansas and the Indian Territory.

Yet, despite this, he was involved in several incriminating affairs that culminated in his being accused of corruption in office by the newspapers in Kansas, and in December of 1873 he resigned without giving an explanation.

In 1879, Scofield’s life seemed to have a turn for the better. He became a Christian and soon began his study in St. Louis to become a pastor and in 1882 became the pastor of the First Congressional Church in Dallas, TX.

Yet, despite this once again, his previous reputation of being a bit of a scoundrel followed him. Soon after he was ordained in Dallas, his wife filed for divorce on the grounds that he had abandoned her and their two daughters.3 Topeka, KS, newspaper “Daily Capital” had the following to say about Schofield in 1881:

“Cyrus I. Scofield, formerly of Kansas, late lawyer, politician, and shyster generally, has come to the surface again. The last personal knowledge that Kansans have had of this peer among scalawags was when about four years ago, after a series of forgeries and confidence games, he left the state and a destitute family and took refuge in Canada… nothing being heard of him until within the past two years when he turned up in St. Louis, where he had a wealthy widowed sister living who had generally come to the front and squared up Cyrus’ little follies and foibles by paying good round sums of money.”

However, despite his reputation, his career really took off after his move to Massachusetts, from where he traveled to New York where he became a member of the Lotos Club, which included members of the likes of Brooke Astor, Andrew Carnegie, and Samuel Clemens. When you look at the list of prominent members of this highly exclusive club, you wonder how on earth a preacher from Kansas got a seat in the club.

It was here that Scofield met Samuel Untermeyer, who was one of the most prominent Zionist influences in America at the time. Untermeyer in turn introduced Scofield to banking interest such as Jacob Schiff, Bernard Baruch, and Kuhn, Loeb. It was these bankers that funded Scofield’s study to make a reference Bible, which included a number of trips to Europe lasting several months. On these trips, he visited Switzerland, among other destination in Europe. Consider this for a moment: why Switzerland? There was very little activity in regards to Church history that happened in Switzerland, except that it was John Calvin’s birthplace. I do not think that it is a coincidence that Switzerland is also home of the Freemasonic Lodge headquarters.

Could it be that this no-name preacher, given his connection in banking and Zionism, was assigned to write the Bible, and did not do it on his own?

Still not convinced that his connections had nothing to do with his Bible’s success? The printing company to publish this new Bible was none other than the Oxford University Press, one of the most prestigious publishers out there. Prior to this, Scofield had only published a few minor pamphlets. How could such a big-name publisher accept such an offer that would otherwise be seen as a huge business and financial risk, if it had not been for the “proper” financial backing that Scofield had received?

In his Bible, the suffix D.D. is after his name, indicating that he had received his doctorate of divinity. However, if this is true, why has no university has ever taken credit that the author of one of the most successful Bibles in the world attended their school?

Zionism – a False Prophecy

What about the Bible itself? I’ve harped about Scofield quite a bit, but what about his main life’s work?

As I mentioned earlier, the reference Bible he created propagated such teachings as the Gap Theory as well as the pre-tribulation rapture. The Gap Theory basically states that there is a gap between Genesis 1 verses one and two. Other variations of this includes the Day-Age Theory, which says that each “day” that God created the world was actually a long period of time. These theories attempt to reconcile Christianity and evolutionism. However, these two views could not be further apart. Dr. Kent Hovind has done a lot of great research in regards to this area and why evolutionism is irreconcilable with Christianity.

The second major doctrine that Scofield popularized was the pre-tribulation rapture. This is a dangerous philosophy which says that the Christians will be raptured out of this world before the Great Tribulation. This is so dangerous because it produces the mentality of, “We aren’t going to be here for the Tribulation anyway, so why should we worry about the New World Order?” An outstanding exposé of this topic can be found in the marvelous book The Rapture Cult.

There is a third doctrine that this Bible brings forth which is – you have probably already guessed it – Zionism.

In Genesis 15:18, God made a promise with Abram the his children shall occupy the land between the Nile and Euphrates Rivers. What Scofield did in his Bible was say, “Two dispossessions and restorations have been accomplished. Israel is now in the third dispersion, from which she will be restored at the return of the Lord as King under the Davidic Covenant.” The problem is there is nowhere in the Bible that says this. Even the verses that Scofield references as proof do not say this! He just adds this as if it is true.

The problem with the prophecy, that Israel shall have the land between the Nile and Euphrates, is that this is directly contradicts 1 Kings 4:21. Israel has had the whole land under King Solomon. They lost their right to that land because they disobeyed God’s law and rejected the Messiah.

It is because of this that I and many others say that the modern state of Israel is illegitimate.

Is Jesus Seated on the Throne of David Now?

One of the confusions that is often cited as proof that the modern state of Israel is legitimate is the confusion behind when Jesus sits on the Throne of David. Those who say that this is a future event say that Jesus will be enthroned here on earth. Therefore, Israel has to occupy the land in order for this to happen.

However, this is an erroneous idea, because Christ Himself said that His Kingdom is not of this world.

Furthermore, Jeremiah prophesied in Jeremiah 22:28-30, “Is this man Coniah a despised broken idol?… Thus saith the Lord, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.” Coniah is another name for Jeconiah. Jesus is a direct descendent of Jeconiah, proving that He cannot be enthroned on the earthly throne of David.

So, the question remains. Is Christ on the Throne of David now?

Act 2:34-36 answers this question:

It is here that we see that it is when Christ ascended into Heaven that He was seated on the throne of David. He continues to sit there to this day, and will continue to sit there until the enemy is defeated.

1 Corinthians 15:25-26, Hebrews 1:3, 8, 13, Hebrews 10:11-13, and Revelation 3:21 also talk about how Christ is on the throne of David now.

The History of Zionism

Despite Scofield’s Bible being the first to promote the idea of Zionism, he was by no means the first person to think of this.

As we get into this, I would like to note that most this information is taken from Chapter 10 of the book The Rapture Cult by Robert L. Pierce. The book goes through many more details that I can cover here, so I would strongly recommend that you read the book for yourself.

In March 1881, a bomb thrown by a Russian revolutionary murdered Czar Alexander II, ending his policy of appeasement toward the Jews of Russia. Yes, this was a Jewish revolution before the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, which was also predominately Jewish.

Under the new Czar, Alexander III, much harsher measures were taken against the Jewry of Russia. These measures were so repressive of the Jews that is forced many to flee Russia in two main ways.

The first was the underground revolutionary movement, which was the minority of those who were in Russia. This movement is what culminated in the 1917 revolution which solidified Communist control in 1922. I must remind you that, although many of the leaders of this revolution were Jewish by 1917, this was by no means a strictly Jewish conspiracy. This plan had been set well before 1881.

The other major direction that many of the Jews turned to was to seek refuge outside of the country. The idea of the Jews having their own homeland was discussed academically for many years, but it was never put into action.

In 1862, two writings were published that popularized, to some extent, this idea. The first was by Hirsch Kalischer, though most of the religious Jews considered his proposals to be blasphemous.

Another promoter was Moses Hess, who was a friend of Karl Marx when they were students at the University of Bonn. Hess was also a collaborator with Marx and Fredrick Engels and was a dedicated socialist.

However, the world was not ready for Zionism in the 1860s and ‘70s, since it was only represented by a minority of Jews. At the time, most were living quite comfortably, better than in the previous century at least, and they had no particular incentive for the emigration.

However, the assassination of Alexander II and the subsequent crack-down on Jewish Russians changed all that. As such, it was the Russian Jews that were the primary driver of this movement. The migration of Jews to Palestine had already begun trickling in the early 1800s, but it began in earnest in 1882.

1882 was also when Baron Edmond de Rothschild of the French branch of that banking clan began to financially support the Jewish colonies in Palestine. In fact, between 1884 and 1900, he spent 6 million dollars – $200.8 million in today’s currency – on the Zionist colonies. Also in this timeframe, approximately 25,000 Jews migrated to Palestine.

In 1897, the Zionists formally organized themselves, gathering at the First Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland. This established what became known as “political Zionism.” However, not much progress was made by the movement until 1917. This was primarily because not many were aware of the movement, and those who did were strongly opposed to it. It wasn’t until the Balfour Declaration, which publicly declared British support for establishing a home in Palestine for the Jews, in November 1917 that Zionism began picking up steam.

Zionist Chaim Weizmann introduced the idea of Zionism to Prime Minister Arthur Lloyd Balfour. Over the succeeding years, he became close friends with the Prime Minister as well as much of his staff as well as Albert Einstein and Baron Edmond de Rothschild.

Not all were on the side of the movement, however. In fact, the main opposition came from the Jewish community. The Orthodox Jews regarded Zionism as their mortal enemy. To quote Walter Laqueur’s “History of Zionism,” it “was interpreted as the most recent and the most dangerous phase in the continuing Satanic conspiracy against the House of Israel.”

The stalemate finally broke with a letter written by Col. Edward Mandel House, acting for President Woodrow Wilson, to the British government, citing American support for the movement.

The rationale used to explain the Balfour Declaration was that it was a wartime necessity to consolidate Jewish opinion on the side of the allies. This is untrue, since as was just stated that Zionism was strongly opposed by the majority of Jews everywhere, except in Russia. However, this fact was ignored in classic propaganda fashion.

Just as the assassination of Alexander II provided the impetus to Zionism, and just as World War I provided the pretext for the Balfour Declaration, so too did the persecution of the Jews in Germany by the Nazis provide a necessity for the Jewish migration to Palestine.

The final events leading up to the establishment of the State of Israel were those of turmoil, violence, and terrorism involving the Jews, Arabs, and British Army in Palestine, of which I will talk about further in my next blog.

The history of Zionism is fraught with conspiracy and violence. What cannot be overlooked is that fact that so many of those in the Establishment, Great Conspiracy, Illuminati, etc. are behind it – names such as the Rothschilds, Col. House, the Warburgs, Alfred Lord Milner, Henry Morgenthau, and many others. There can be no question as to whether or not this was planned and birthed by the global elite to serve their Satanic agenda.

Summary

Why is all of this important?

The very existence of the State of Israel is used but a multitude of fundamentalist Christians that the “rapture” is near and that resistance to the Satanic elite is not only futile, but unnecessary.

Satan’s main goal is to be like God. Everything that God has set up, Satan wants to copy.

The Nation of Israel was set up through Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as God’s chosen people in the Old Testament. The land set aside for them was the land between the Nile and Euphrates Rivers. The capital was Jerusalem.

In the New Testament, the Commonwealth of Israel was expanded to the gentiles. All who are a part of the Body of Christ are now the true Jews.

Just as God set aside the Israelites as His people, I believe that those who call themselves Jews – at least those who are “in” on the plans for a global government – are Satan’s “chosen people.” The modern State of Israel is a counterfeit of the original. It is ABSOLUTELY NOT a God-ordained nation. All you have to do is look at their flag. The 6-pointed star is a highly occult symbol, and never was the Star of David.4 The stripes represent the Nile and Euphrates.

Should we be supporting Israel today? That is the question we should ask. If all of this is true – that the modern state of Israel is a result of the Satanic plan and was set up by those wishing to destroy humanity as we know it – why would any Christian want to support a country whose capital, Tel Aviv, is one of the gay capitals of the world? Is it Godly or moral to support a nation who plunders and robs the previous inhabitants of their homeland? Where is the Biblical justification for this?

Someone may ask, “Well, if Israel is so bad, why is it such a prosperous nation? Why has it won every single war that it has been a part of?” The answer is, as we have been discussing this whole time, because of the forces backing that county. No other nation has supported Israel more than the United States. America is the only country that has been completely steadfast in its support for Israel over the years. No wonder the Muslims hate America so bad!

Now that we have gone over the history of Israel as its modern form of Zionism, what have been the fruits of it? That is what we shall be discussing in the next blog on this topic. I think the information will surprise most of my readers who are not familiar with this history.

Noted Sources:

  1. https://www.bitchute.com/video/s1nPYDj7KBEQ/
  2. James Perloff, Truth is a Lonely Warrior, (Refuge Books, 2013), 153-154
  3. Ibid., 229
  4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8OuVlCvVWE&t=31s

Another great source I have used is the following podcast with James Perloff, entitled “James Perloff on Christian Zionism and the New World Order:” https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/tkelly6785757/episodes/2016-09-28T18_49_57-07_00

Leave a comment